Copyleft: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus InfoWissWiki - Das Wiki der Informationswissenschaft
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
 
Zeile 6: Zeile 6:
  
 
==Lizenzen ohne Copyleft-Effekt==
 
==Lizenzen ohne Copyleft-Effekt==
HIER reicht ja wohl auch nur der Link zu der Quelle!
 
Wozu nochmal was schreiben, was sowieso schon im Web steht?
 
  
 
http://www.ifross.de/ifross_html/lizenzcenter.html
 
http://www.ifross.de/ifross_html/lizenzcenter.html
 
a) BSDartige Lizenzen
 
 
Zu den BSDartigen Lizenzen gehört die Original BSD-Lizenz und die ihr nachgebildeten Derivate.
 
# Apache License (v. 1.0), http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.0
 
# Apache License (v. 1.1), http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1
 
# [[http://server02.is.uni-sb.de/courses/wiki/index.php/Apache_license Apache License (v. 2.0)]], http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
 
# Attribution Assurance License, http://eepatents.com/privaria/#license
 
# Berkeley Database Product License, http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/license/license_db.html
 
# 4.4 BSD Copyright (Original BSD-Lizenz), http://www.de.freebsd.org/copyright/license.html
 
# FreeBSD Copyright (Modifizierte BSD-Lizenz), http://www.de.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html
 
# BSD License (Original), http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#6
 
#Christian Software Public License, http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Node/4081/cspl.html
 
#Cougaar Open Source License, http://cougaar.org/docman/view.php/7/138/license.html (qualification controversial)
 
#Cryptix General License, http://www.cryptix.org/LICENSE.TXT
 
#Eiffel Forum License (v. 1.0), http://www.eiffel-nice.org/license/forum.txt
 
#Eiffel Forum License (v. 2.0), http://www.eiffel-nice.org/license/eiffel-forum-license-2.html
 
#Entessa Public License (EPL) (v. 1.0), http://www.openseal.org/epl
 
#Free Fuzzy Logic Library Open Source License, http://ffll.sourceforge.net/license.htm
 
#Intel Open Source License for CDSA/CSSM Implementation, http://www.opensource.org/licenses/intel-open-source-license.php
 
#Lua Copyright notice, http://www.lua.org/license.html
 
#MIT License, http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
 
#Mozart License, http://www.mozart-oz.org/LICENSE.html
 
#OpenLDAP Public License (v. 2.3), http://www.mibsoftware.com/librock/librock/license/oldap2_3.txt
 
#OpenLDAP Public License (v. 2.5), http://www.covalent.net/legal/docs/license_openldap.txt
 
#OpenLDAP Public License (v. 2.7), http://www.openldap.org/software/release/license.html
 
#Open Media Group Open Source License, http://www.openmediagroup.com/license.html
 
#Pangeia Informatica Copyright (v. 1.2), http://www.chkrootkit.org/COPYRIGHT
 
#Phorum License (v. 2.0), http://phorum.org/license.txt
 
#[[http://server02.is.uni-sb.de/courses/wiki/index.php/Php_license PHP License (v. 3.0)]], http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
 
#Python Copyright, http://www.python.org/doc/Copyright.html
 
#skyBuilders Open Source License, http://www.skybuilders.com/OpenSourceLicense.html
 
#SpeechWorks Public License - Software (v. 1.1), http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/openvxi/OpenVXI_1_4/License.txt
 
#4Suite License (v. 1.1), http://4suite.org/COPYRIGHT.doc
 
#Tea Software License, http://teatrove.sourceforge.net/license.html
 
#UdanaxTM Open-Source License , http://www.udanax.com/license.html
 
#Vovida Software License, http://www.vovida.org/document/VOCAL-1.4.0/license.txt
 
#W3C Software Notice and License, http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software.html
 
#Wide Open License (WOL), http://www.dspguru.com/wol2.htm
 
#X Window System License, http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html
 
#The license of ZLib, http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_license.html
 
#The SpeechWorks Public License (v. 1.1 ), http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/openvxi/OpenVXI_1_4/License.txt
 
 
b) Sonstige Lizenzen ohne Copyleft-Effekt
 
#Academic Free License (AFL) (v. 1.1), http://www.infa.abo.fi/~sundman/COSAed/afl.html
 
#Academic Free License (AFL) (v. 1.2), http://www.opensource.org/licenses/afl-1.2.txt
 
#CNRI Open Source License Agreement (bis Python 1.6), http://www.handle.net/python_licenses/python1.6_9-5-00.html
 
#Free Software License, http://www.suneido.com/free_software_license.htm
 
#Galen Open Source License (GOSL), http://www.opengalen.org/gosl.html
 
#Globus Toolkit Public License, http://tyne.dl.ac.uk/StarterKit/gt2/toolkit/download/license.html
 
#Globus Toolkit Public License (GTPL) (v. 2.0), http://www-unix.globus.org/toolkit/license.html
 
#ICU License, http://source.icu-project.org/repos/icu/icu/trunk/license.html
 
#ISC License, http://mirbsd.org/ISC-Licence
 
#MirOS License, http://mirbsd.org/MirOS-Licence
 
#Open Group Test Suite License, http://www.opengroup.org/testing/downloads/The_Open_Group_TSL.txt
 
#PSF License Agreement (Python), http://www.python.org/2.0.1/license.html
 
#Ruby License, http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt
 
#Sendmail License, http://www.sendmail.org/ftp/LICENSE
 
#SFL License Agreement (iMatix), http://www.imatix.com/html/sfl/sfl4.htm
 
#Standard ML of New Jersey Copyright Notice, http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/what/smlnj/license.html
 
#Suneido Free Software License, http://www.suneido.com/free_software_license.htm
 
#Tcl/Tk License Terms, http://dev.scriptics.com/software/tcltk/license_terms.html
 
#xinetd License, http://www.xinetd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xinetd/COPYRIGHT?rev=1.1.1.1;content-type=text%2Fplain
 
#Zope Public License (v. 2.1), http://www.zope.org/Resources/ZPL
 
 
'''Quelle: Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software, Lizenzen (http://www.ifross.de/)'''
 
 
==Lizenzen mit strengem Copyleft-Effekt ==
 
a) GPLartige Lizenzen
 
#Affero General Public License, http://www.affero.org/oagpl.html
 
#eCos license (v. 2.0), http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ecos-license.html
 
#Alternate Route Open Source License (v. 1.1), http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/bridge/alternateroute/arosl.htm
 
#CrossPoint Quelltextlizenz, http://www.crosspoint.de/srclicense.html
 
# eCos license (v. 2.0), http://www.gnu.org/licenses/ecos-license.html
 
# FreeCard License, http://freecard.sourceforge.net/website/licence/license.php
 
# GNU Classpath - GPL with special exception, http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/license.html
 
#GNU Emacs General Public License, http://www.free-soft.org/gpl_history/emacs_gpl.html
 
#GNU General Public License (GPL) (v. 1.0), http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copying-1.0.html
 
# [[http://server02.is.uni-sb.de/courses/wiki/index.php/GNU-Generel_Public_License GNU General Public License (GPL) (v. 2.0)]], http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html
 
#GNU General Public License (GPL) (v. 2.0) - Inoffizielle deutsche Übersetzung, http://www.gnu.de/gpl-ger.html
 
# Honest Public License (HPL) (v. 1.1), http://www.funambol.com/opensource/project/HPLv1.1.txt
 
# Open Patent License, http://www.fsmlabs.com/openpatentlicense.html 28
 
 
b) Sonstige Lizenzen mit strengem Copyleft-Effekt
 
#Apple Public Source License (v. 2.0), http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/2.0.txt
 
#Arphic Public License, http://lmj.nagaokaut.ac.jp/doc/ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp/license/english/ARPHICPL.TXT.gz
 
# Common Public License, http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
 
#Deutsche Freie Softwarelizenz (d-fsl), http://www.d-fsl.org
 
#[[http://server02.is.uni-sb.de/courses/wiki/index.php/Eclipse_public_license Eclipse Public License (v. 1.0)]], http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
 
# IBM Public License, http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/license10.html
 
# Jabber Open Source License, http://www.jabber.org/about/josl.shtml
 
# Nethack General Public License, http://www.nethack.org/common/license.html
 
#Open Group Public License, http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/license
 
# Open Software License (OSL) (v 2.1), http://opensource.org/licenses/osl-2.1.php
 
# RedHat eCos Public License (v. 1.1), http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/license-overview.html
 
# Salutation Public License, http://www.salutation.org/lite/lite_license.htm
 
# Software AG License Terms (Quip License) (v. 1.3), http://developer.softwareag.com/tamino/quip/license.htm
 
# Vim License, http://www.polarhome.com/vim/manual/v61/uganda.html#license
 
 
'''Quelle: Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software, Lizenzen ([http://www.ifross.de/])'''
 
 
==Lizenzen mit beschränktem Copyleft-Effekt==
 
a) MPLartige Lizenzen
 
#Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) (v. 1.0), http://www.sun.com/cddl/cddl.html
 
#Erlang Public License (v. 1.1), http://www.erlang.org/EPLICENSE
 
#ICS Open Source Public License, http://www.opencontrol.org/OSPL.htm
 
#Interbase Public License, http://www.borland.com/devsupport/interbase/opensource/IPL.html
 
#[[Mozilla public license|Mozilla Public License (v. 1.0)]], http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.0.html
 
#[[Mozilla public license |Mozilla Public License (v. 1.1)]], http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.html
 
#NASA Open Source Agreement (v. 1.3), http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/worldwind-nosa-1.3.html
 
#Netizen Open Source License (NOSL), http://web.archive.org/web/20000815212105/bits.netizen.com.au/licenses/NOSL
 
#Nokia Open Source License, http://www.opensource.org/licenses/nokia.php
 
#Open Telecom Public License, http://www.opentelecom.org/otpl/otpl.html
 
#Ricoh Source Code Public License, http://www.risource.org/RPL/RPL-1.0A.shtml
 
#Sun Public License, http://www.netbeans.org/about/legal/spl.html
 
#Sun Industry Standards Source License (v. 1.1), http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/sissl_license.html
 
#Zenplex Public License, http://www.zenplex.org/zpl_txt.html
 
#Common Developement and distribution License (CDDL), http://www.sun.com/cddl/cddl.html
 
 
b) Sonstige Lizenzen mit beschränktem Copyleft-Effekt
 
#Bremer Lizenz für freie Softwarebibliotheken (OSCI-Lizenz) (v. 1.0), http://www.bva.bund.de
 
#Cougaar Open Source License Agreement, http://cougaar.org/docman/view.php/17/126/old_cosl_license.html (Einordnung umstritten)
 
#Hi-Potent Open Source License, http://www.hi-potent.com/license.html
 
#GNU Library General Public License (LGPL) (v. 2.0), http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lgpl.html
 
#GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) (v. 2.1), http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/lgpl.html
 
#GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) (v. 2.1) - Inoffizielle deutsche Übersetzung, http://www.gnu.de/lgpl-ger.html
 
#Microsoft Community License (Ms-CL), http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/licensingbasics/communitylicense.mspx
 
#Motosoto Open Source License (v. 0.9.1), http://opensource.org/licenses/motosoto.php
 
#Sybase Open Watcom Public License, http://downloads.openwatcom.org/ftp/license.txt
 
#wxWindows Library License (v. 3.0), http://www.freiburg.linux.de/~wxxt/licence.html
 
 
'''Quelle: Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software, Lizenzen ([http://www.ifross.de/])'''
 
 
==Lizenzen mit Wahlmöglichkeiten ==
 
#Artistic License (v. 1.0), http://www.perl.com/language/misc/Artistic.html (Einordnung umstritten)
 
#Artistic License (v. 2.0), http://www.perlfoundation.org/legal/licenses/artistic-2_0.html
 
#Clarified Artistic License, http://www.statistica.unimib.it/utenti/dellavedova/software/artistic2.html
 
#Keith Devens' Open Source License, http://www.keithdevens.com/software/license/
 
#LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL) (v. 1.2), http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/macros/latex/base/lppl.txt
 
#Microsoft Permissive License (Ms-PL), http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/licensingbasics/permissivelicense.mspx
 
#Physnet Package License, http://35.9.69.219/home/modules/license.html
 
#SGI Free Software License B (v. 1.0) , http://oss.sgi.com/projects/FreeB/SGIFreeSWLicB.1.0.html (Einordnung umstritten)
 
#SGI Free Software License B (v. 1.1) , http://oss.sgi.com/projects/FreeB/ (Einordnung umstritten)
 
#Sleepycat Software Product License, http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/sleepycat/license.html
 
 
'''Quelle: Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software, Lizenzen ([http://www.ifross.de/])'''
 
 
==Lizenzen mit Sonderrechten ==
 
#Apple Public Source License (v. 1.2), http://www.opensource.org/licenses/apsl.php (Einordnung umstritten)
 
#Macromedia Open Source License Agreement (v. 1.0), http://www.adobe.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?ID=23075
 
#Netscape Public License (NPL) (v. 1.0), http://www.mozilla.org/NPL/NPL-1.0.html
 
#Netscape Public License (NPL) (v. 1.1), http://www.mozilla.org/NPL/NPL-1.1.html
 
#OCLC Research Public License (v. 1.0), http://www.oclc.org/research/software/license/index.shtm
 
#OCLC Research Public License (v. 2.0), http://purl.oclc.org/oclc/research/ORPL
 
#Open Map Software License Agreement, http://openmap.bbn.com/license.html
 
#Q Public License (QPL), http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/qpl.html
 
#RealNetworks Community Source License (v 2.0) https://helixcommunity.org/content/rcsl
 
#RealNetworks Public Source License (RPSL) (v. 1.0), https://community.helixcommunity.org/content/rpsl
 
  
 
'''Quelle: Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software, Lizenzen ([http://www.ifross.de/])'''
 
'''Quelle: Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software, Lizenzen ([http://www.ifross.de/])'''

Aktuelle Version vom 26. Juli 2010, 13:00 Uhr

Ein Begriff, der im Zusammenhang von Open Source und Freie Software wichtig ist, ist das Copyleft. Die Gegenbewegung zum Copyright wurde von Richard Stallmann (Free Software Foundation [(http://www.fsf.org)]) begründet und verleiht Dritten die Möglichkeit sich das Copyright eines anderen zu „leihen“.

„Copyleft is a general method for making a program free software and requiring all modified and extended versions of the program to be free software as well.“ (Free Software Foundation [(http://www.fsf.org)])

Softwarenutzungsrechte unterscheiden sich hauptsächlich über die Strenge des Copylefts. Es kann also gesagt werden, dass eine Typisierung der Lizenzen sich nach dem Grad des Copylefts vornehmen lässt:

Lizenzen ohne Copyleft-Effekt

http://www.ifross.de/ifross_html/lizenzcenter.html

Quelle: Institut für Rechtsfragen der Freien und Open Source Software, Lizenzen ([1])

… weitere Daten zur Seite „Copyleft
Die Gegenbewegung zum Copyright wurde von Richard Stallmann (Free Software Foundation [(http://www.fsf.org)]) begründet und verleiht Dritten die Möglichkeit sich das Copyright eines anderen zu „leihen“. +